|
|
Back
to Main Page
Vitamins Health Nutrition News Videos
Video Comments
|
HomeopathicDana (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm) |
| The term for the use of radio waves in the ocean is "extremely low frequencies." The low amplitude may go along for the ride. And when you consider that our body is full of "salt water" (or a mineral-rich water), a similar low frequency/low amplitude/low dose may be the most effective way to convey the signal...I hope this helps... |
|
F0XD1E (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm) |
| A low frequency has nothing to do with "how much" wave there is. If you wanted to make a comparison between waves and nano doses, the wave equivalent would be incredibly low amplitudes, not frequency. |
|
den151redbank (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm) |
| but you don't really see the patients getting better. What I have seen in my homeopathic work is that it really does seem to help people get better. I'm not saying I can cure everyone, but I do see where people's overall health is improved over the course of treatment.'" - Jennifer Jacobs, MDClearly, the FDA does NOT disapprove of hom. as has been implied. |
|
den151redbank (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm) |
| For the purpose of general edification and to clarify mgcaustin's comment below "If you think the FDA *APPROVES* OF HOMEOPATHY you should...", the FDA's web site page on hom. provides: 1)a brief history of hom.,2)an explanation of its regulatory stance,3)some facts about hom. IT ALSO CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING: "Why does someone trained in conv. med. turn to homeopathy? 'With chronic illnesses such as arthritis and allergies conventional medicine has solutions that help control the symptoms, |
|
JimHewittWhite (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm) |
| Homeopathic Dana, Your videos were a factor in my conversion to homeopathy this August. I've had some really amazing results since then, and am encouraging my friends and family to try this great form of medicine. Thankyou. |
|
MGCAUSTIN (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm) |
| If you are aware of any controlled, double blind studies that support homeopathy, I am willing to look at them. Most of the "positive" studies I have seen so far either lack a control group or are not double blind. |
|
MGCAUSTIN (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm) |
| "I did not accuse you of lying."I apologize for that statement. Looking back on the thread, it was actually KetteringMD who made the accusation.I appreciate that you accept homeopathy. Please don't take any of this as personal. Yes, I am skeptical and I believe that there must be some way to scientifically validate any form of medicine, be it "alternative" or otherwise. |
|
MGCAUSTIN (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm) |
| Okay, let's assume that the concept of "water memory" is valid. How do you explain those homeopathic remedies what use sugar pills? All the water in them has long since evaporated. Do we now have "sugar memory" as well? Maybe HomeopathicDana would like to chime in on this, since den151redbank has withdrawn from the discussion. |
|
den151redbank (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm) |
| I did not accuse you of lying. You have consistently ignored or denied the validity of my comments. You have repeatedly tried to force your ideas of what constitutes good medicine on me.I know and trust homeopathy. There is nothing in your posts nor is there anything you could possibly post that would change my mind.End of discussion. |
|
MGCAUSTIN (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm) |
| "How many molecules are there in a magnetic field?"The obvious answer is "zero", but why does it matter? Are you saying that the water in a homeopathic remedy is magnetized?Do you subscribe to Hahnemann's law of similars and law of infinitesimals or do you believe that there is some as yet undiscovered mechanism at work in homeopathy? To what mechanism to you attribute homeopathy's effects?Can you point me to some controlled, double blind studies showing positive results? |
|
Back
to Main Page
|
|